Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41508111›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026

A mixed methods analysis of clinics' perspectives on community factors influencing access to medications for opioid use disorder.

Samuel Jaros, Maryam Abdel Magid, Hannah Cheng, Michele Gassman, Hélène Chokron Garneau, James H Ford Ii, Mark McGovern

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05343793 (Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05343793 nacompletednot on this map

Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsAddiction, OpioidArmsEnhanced Monitoring and Feedback (EMF), NIATx/MAT Academy, NIATx-Internal Facilitation (NIATx-IF), NIATx-External Facilitation (NIATx-EF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel JarosDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Alway Building, Mail code: 5405, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. samjaros@stanford.edu.
Maryam Abdel MagidStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hannah ChengStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michele GassmanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Hélène Chokron GarneauStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
James H Ford IiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mark McGovernStanford Center for Dissemination and Implementation, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)R01DA052975 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JAMES H, MCGOVERN, MARK P · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Examining patterns of opioid overdose hotspots and opioid treatment deserts in CaliforniaF31DA057107 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAROS, SAMUEL · 2023 to 2025
$126k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA057107NIDA NIH HHS F31DA057107NIDA NIH HHS P50DA05407NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052975NIDA NIH HHS R01DA052975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow communities impact patients taking medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has not been well-studied. Understanding the experience of MOUD providers allows us to better understand and measure community attitudes toward MOUD and identify strategies to increase support.

methodsWe deployed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to analyze baseline data from the SITT-MAT clinical trial. Our quantitative instrument was seven Likert-scale questions asking about community attitudes toward MOUD analyzed through means, standard deviations, and principal components. The qualitative data were semi-structured interviews coded inductively using a thematic analysis. The quantitative and qualitative results were integrated to produce the findings.

resultsWe surveyed staff from 20 specialty care addiction and primary care clinics in Washington state as part of a larger clinical trial. Eleven sites were also selected to complete an interview. Participating clinics were primarily specialty addiction treatment programs (N = 14, 70%), outpatient (N = 17, 85%), and/or located in urban areas (N = 12, 81%). In the survey, participants most agreed that relationships with other clinics help provide better care and least agreed that system-level policies mandate MOUD. In interviews, some staff described how reliable relationships with other clinics improved employee morale and patient care while others added that loose collaborations had fallen apart, leaving patients without the care they need. Interviewees described how insurer and government policies have made it difficult to expand their MOUD offerings. The interview data also indicated community attitudes on MOUD have improved over time with some clinics using direct outreach to garner support for MOUD.

conclusionsOur results suggest that building local peer networks of clinics can improve staff morale and patient care in areas where community support for MOUD is low. Though system-level barriers to MOUD have been reduced, there is still room for improvement in simplifying reimbursements and funding for clinics looking to improve care. Our findings encourage further measurement of community attitudes toward MOUD and development of implementation strategies to build networks that support patients and clinics alike.

trial registrationThe data for this study is from the Stagewise Implementation-to-Target - Medications for Addiction Treatment clinical trial registered as NCT05343793 on April 25, 2022.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWashingtonBuprenorphineNarcotic AntagonistsClinic perspectiveCommunity attitudesMedications for opioid use disorderMixed methodsOpioid addiction treatment

Identifiers

PMID41508111
PMCPMC12825234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.