ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Reproductive efficiency and longevity of gilts and sows in group housing and free-farrowing systems versus traditional crate systems in tropical environments.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening and functional verification of potential metabolites for high fertility in sows.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGroup housing systems during gestation and free-farrowing pens have recently been implemented in Thailand. This study aimed to investigate how different housing systems, sow parity number and season affect the following outcomes: the percentage of sows returning to oestrus after insemination, farrowing rate, litter traits, piglet preweaning mortality and the age at which sows are removed from the herd. The dataset included 61066 service records from 15666 Landrace × Yorkshire crossbred gilts and sows across three housing systems within a breeding herd. The service records were categorized based on housing systems into three groups: conventional crate (CC, n = 11020), pen gestation with temporary confinement for 35 days post-mating and 10 days post-farrowing (PC, n = 16689) and pen gestation with temporary confinement for 7 days post-mating and complete free-farrowing (PP, n = 33357). The parity numbers of sows were divided into four groups: 0 (n = 11300), 1 (n = 10203), 2 to 4 (n = 25447) and ≥ 5 (n = 14116). The seasons were classified according to farrowing months into three groups: hot (16 Feb to 15 Jun), rainy (15 Jun to 15 Oct) and cool (16 Oct to 15 Feb).
resultsSows in the CC group had higher farrowing rates and lower remating rates compared with the PC and PP groups (P < 0.001). Litter size was larger in the PP group than in CC and PC groups (P < 0.001), whereas BW was higher in PC group than in PP group (P < 0.05). A significant housing × parity × season interaction influenced most fertility and litter traits, with PP sows showing reduced farrowing rates, increased remating rates and lower BW, particularly in gilts and primiparous sows during the hot and rainy seasons. Weaning performance (NW and WW) was highest in CC sows, especially in gilts across all seasons (P < 0.001). PWM was lower in CC group compared to PC and PP groups (P < 0.001) and influenced by a housing × season interaction (P < 0.001). Sow longevity differed among housing systems, with CC and PC sows remaining in the herd longer and having higher stayability than PP sows (P < 0.001).
conclusionSows in group housing systems experienced lower farrowing rate and higher remating rate. Sows in group housing with free-farrowing system had higher litter size and higher piglet preweaning mortality rate compared to those in the conventional crate system. Sows in the conventional crate system and group housing with temporary confinement post-farrowing remained in the herds longer than sows in group-housed with complete free-farrowing. Hence, there is a need for interventions and husbandry management for balancing animal welfare with reproductive trade-offs in these alternative welfare-friendly systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.