Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507937›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Implementing virtual reality based surgical topographic anatomy for the education of medical students: a pilot study.

Jan Philipp Ramspott, Alexander D Bungert, Carsten Szardenings, Isabelle Flammang, Felix Becker, Markus Holling, Felicia Kneifel, Andreas Pascher, Haluk Morgül

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan Philipp Ramspott *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany. janphilipp.ramspott@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9248-2294
Alexander D Bungert *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Carsten SzardeningsInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Isabelle FlammangDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Felix BeckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Markus HollingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Felicia KneifelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Haluk MorgülDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, Waldeyerstraße 1,, Münster, 48149, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical specialties necessitate a comprehensive understanding of anatomy. Traditional two-dimensional anatomical teaching methods lack the depth required for spatial comprehension. Virtual reality (VR)-based anatomy models offer a promising alternative, enabling an enhanced understanding of surgical topographic anatomy. This study investigated the feasibility and teaching value of VR-based surgical anatomy teaching. In addition, we explored the impact of pursuing a future surgical career.

methodsMeta Quest 2 VR system with Medicalholodeck “Anatomy and Dissection Master XR” software applications was used for virtual segmentation of a mediastinal and abdominal model annotated with anatomical terminology. The feasibility, knowledge gain, and teaching value of the VR-based topographic surgical anatomy were evaluated using a newly developed 14-item self-report questionnaire that included numeric rating scales (0–10; 0: no knowledge gain/teaching value; 10: high knowledge gain/teaching value) and dichotomous questions.

resultsThirty-seven medical students performed the instructor-guided virtual segmentation. Participants reported a high knowledge gain (median 8) and perceived teaching value (median 9) regarding complex mediastinal anatomy. Four students (11%) reconsidered their later professions after the VR sessions. Statistical analyses did not reveal any significant differences among students of different ages, genders, or educational levels.

conclusionsThis study showed that the implementation of VR-based surgical topographic anatomy teaching for medical student education is feasible. As an additional tool to conventional anatomical teaching, it could enhance teaching value irrespective of age, gender, or educational level, and may influence subsequent surgical career decisions. The questionnaire requires further refinement including the standardized assessment of anatomical knowledge.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalVirtual RealityAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleModels, AnatomicPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultExtended realityQuestionnaireSurgeryTeachingVR

Identifiers

PMID41507937
PMCPMC12849294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.