ArticleBMC medical education2026
Pre-anesthetic evaluation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in China: a national web-based questionnaire survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn China, the demand for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) has surged since the introduction of the nationwide Cancer Screening Program in 2012, while anesthesia staffing remains insufficient. Pre-anesthetic evaluation (PAE) is crucial for safe sedation, however, PAE practices in China have not been thoroughly examined.
methodsWe conducted a national web-based questionnaire survey among anesthesiologists across China from January to February 2024, focusing on PAE and sedation practices for GIE.
resultsA total of 413 anesthesiologists from 282 hospitals across the 31 provincial-level administrative regions of mainland China (Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao were not included) participated. Key findings included: Dual PAE timing (before and on the day of GIE) significantly reduced same-day procedure cancellations (15.2% vs. 31.5%, p < 0.01); Preoperative testing was dominated by non-risk-stratified ECG (95.0%) despite limited evidence; and significant variability existed in assessment strategies among anesthesiologists, unrelated to professional seniority or hospital level.
conclusionsThis survey reveals critical gaps in China's PAE practices for GIE. Aligning PAE practices with evidence-based protocols and embracing digital health innovations could optimize perioperative safety and mitigate anesthesia workforce challenges. These measures may significantly enhance perioperative care for GIE patients in China. Moreover, the findings highlight critical educational gaps and provide insights for curriculum design and competency-based training in anesthesia and endoscopy sedation, which may significantly enhance the quality of perioperative care for GIE patients in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.