ArticleBMC women's health2026
Mapping the social impact of menstrual stigma in Spain.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates the social impact of menstrual stigma in Spain. Whilst menstruation is a biological process, it is shaped by cultural norms that influence how it is perceived, experienced, and managed.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted with 4,028 participants aged 14 years and older. Quantitative items were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative open-ended responses were thematically analysed through a constructivist lens to explore social perceptions, behavioural responses, and institutional dynamics related to menstruation.
resultsMenstruation affects participation in everyday activities, particularly those involving physical exposure such as sports, swimming, or wearing certain types of clothing. While some respondents reported avoiding activities due to physical symptoms, others cited anxiety, fear of leakage, or social discomfort, reflecting internalised stigma. In professional and educational settings, participants described presenteeism, reluctance to take leave, and a sense of pressure to minimise or conceal menstrual needs. Experiences of exclusion, whether from religious rituals, traditional roles, or interpersonal interactions, were also reported. Despite these challenges, the study highlights the positive role of supportive social environments. Solidarity, peer empathy, and institutional flexibility were identified as protective factors that help counter the effects of stigma. However, gaps in menstrual education and limited integration of menstrual health in clinical contexts continue to pose barriers to well-being and equity.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need to recognise menstruation as a relevant factor in public health, education, and workplace inclusion. Addressing menstrual stigma requires structural attention and a shift from individual responsibility to collective and institutional support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.