ArticleBMC health services research2026
Barriers to access, pathways to equity: clinicians' perspectives on mental health service delivery.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A user centered evaluation framework for mobile health applications using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: evidence from expert reviews and user experience data.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study explored clinicians' perceptions of the barriers that immigrant, refugee, and ethnically diverse populations face in accessing mental health (MH) care in Canada, the challenges clinicians encounter in service delivery, and their recommendations for improving access and quality of care.
methodsGuided by a practice-based research approach, a qualitative descriptive approach was used, employing semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. The study was conducted across community-based MH organizations in multiple Canadian provinces within primary and community care settings. Nineteen MH clinicians, including social workers, psychotherapists, and counselors were purposively sampled. Eligible participants were currently employed in MH roles and had direct experience working with diverse populations; there were no formal exclusion criteria.
resultsClinicians identified two overarching categories of barriers: logistical challenges (such as long wait times, cost, and limited access to multilingual services) and cultural/social barriers (including stigma, cultural mismatch, and mistrust of Western MH models). Clinicians also reported institutional challenges, such as limited training and resources for culturally responsive care. Recommendations focused on enhancing cultural responsiveness, increasing clinician education, and implementing system-level changes to reduce structural inequities.
conclusionsClinician insights highlight the need for more accessible, equitable, and culturally responsive MH services for diverse populations in Canada. These findings have implications for future research, clinician training, and policy reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.