ArticleBMC health services research2026
Developing and psychometrics assessment of a checklist for safe intrahospital patient transfer.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe absence of clear policies and standardized guidelines for intrahospital transfer poses a substantial threat to patient safety. To address this gap, we designed a study to develop a comprehensive, standardized checklist for safe intrahospital patient transfer within Iranian hospitals.
methodsA sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was employed in Shahid-Beheshti hospital, Kashan, Iran, in 2023 to develop and validate a checklist for safe intrahospital patient transfer. The process was planned and conducted in two phases: qualitative item generation and psychometric evaluation. Phase I involved item generation through a qualitative content analysis of the literature to identify essential care measures (across the pre-transfer, intra-transfer, and post-transfer phases) and expert consultations to elicit the experts’ tacit professional knowledge on the phenomenone under the study. Then, the research team integrated items generated by the two aforementioned methods and created a preliminary item pool. The research team then synthesized and refined these expert-generated items with those derived from the literature to create a comprehensive draft checklist. The validation process included assessments of face validity, content validity, and construct validity. To evaluate reliability, inter-rater agreement, Cohen’s kappa, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) were used.
resultsThe initial item pool consisted of 55 items, which were subsequently reduced to 45 items during the face validity and qualitative content validity assessments. Then, the number of items was reduced to 38 during the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) assessments. The CVR of the remaining items ranged from 0.9 to 0.98, while their CVI ranged from 0.9 to 0.99. The mean Cohen’s kappa across items was 0.62 ± 0.12. The ICC for the total score was 0.86. Cronbach’s alpha for the entire checklist was 0.79. In construct validity assessment, three factors, consistent with the three domains of the checklist, were extracted that cumulatively explained 46.79% of the variance in patient transfer safety.
conclusionA comprehensive intrahospital patient transfer checklist was developed, demonstrating good validity and reliability, and can be used by healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, to ensure safe intrahospital patient transfers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.