Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507883›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Assessment of the content validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD): a qualitative study.

John H Powers, Rachel Ballinger, Andrea De Palma, Marie de la Cruz, Kellee Howard

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John H PowersGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Rachel BallingerICON Insights, Evidence and Value, Reading, UK. Rachel.Ballinger@iconplc.com.
Andrea De PalmaFormerly ICON Insights, Evidence and Value, Milan, Italy.
Marie de la CruzICON Insights, Evidence and Value, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Kellee HowardFormerly ICON Insights, Evidence and Value, Quebec City, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDegenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common disorder that can lead to chronic lower back pain (CLBP). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a well-established instrument for diseases of the lumbar spine and lower back pain (LBP), covering pain intensity and pain-related disability. This study evaluated the content validity of the modified electronic ODI among patients with DDD and CLBP in the United States (US).

methodCognitive interviews were conducted with 12 participants from the US diagnosed with DDD and CLBP using a semi-structured interview guide to assess the comprehension and relevance of the ODI. Concept saturation was achieved by the 12th interview.

resultsTwelve participants (mean age 40 years old, standard deviation 11 years) including 11 females provided interpretations of the instructions and for each section that were aligned with the intended meanings (11–12/12, ≥ 92%). Sections were relevant to participants’ experience (11–12/12, ≥ 92%), with the sex life section being less relevant (9/12, 75%). Response options were easy to understand. Participants’ interpretations aligned with response options’ intended meanings in 7/10 sections, with less alignment in the lifting, social life, sex life sections due to perceived similarities in ≥ 2 response options. Participants used different recall periods across sections, which was often related to the absence of experiencing the activity at the time of the interview. Most (7/9, 78%) preferred the use of a one-week recall period.

conclusionsThis study confirms the content validity of the ODI in patients with DDD. The ODI with a seven-day recall period would be more appropriate for use in this population to evaluate patient outcomes in a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainPain MeasurementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsContent validityDegenerative disc diseaseElectronic versionLow back painOswestry disability indexPain measurement

Identifiers

PMID41507883
PMCPMC12784488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.