ArticleBMC public health2026
Epidemiological characteristics and public health responses against measles in the Ottoman empire and the early Turkish Republic.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasles is an infectious disease that affects mostly children. It is caused by the measles morbillivirus, which can be spread through inhalation and direct contact with the patient. There are insufficient literary documents on the prevalence of measles in the Ottoman Empire; its seasonal variation, the public health responses and epidemiological changes it caused.
methodsThis study reviews archival documents from the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic Archives, alongside relevant literature, to investigate measles cases, mortality patterns, seasonal distribution and public health interventions between the 18th century and 1938. The analysis focuses on quantifiable epidemiological data and recorded official measures such as quarantine, school closures, disinfection practices, and isolation protocols.
resultsA total of 2716 people had measles in the Ottoman Empire, 462 (17.0%) of whom died. Among the patients, 116 (4.3%) were adults, and 2600 (95.7%) were children. Thirty-six (31.0%) of the adult patients died, and 396 (15.2%) of the child patients died. These figures represent only the documented portion that reached central administration through archival notification; the true burden in the Ottoman period was undoubtedly higher due to under-reporting and non-standardized disease registration, exacerbated by almost continuous warfare, territorial losses, population displacements, and administrative disruptions during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which further limited the completeness and continuity of public health reporting. In the early Turkish Republic (from 1920 to 1938), 67,427 measles patients were identified. Of these, 67,427 were children, and 4571 (6.8%) of the children died. The highest number of deaths from measles disease in Istanbul occurred in children aged 0-5 years (35.7%) in the Ottoman Empire.
conclusionsMeasles was a persistent and high-mortality childhood disease in both periods studied with marked seasonal and regional variations. Archival records demonstrate that the Ottoman Empire and the early Turkish Republic implemented a range of organized public health responses to limit transmission, many of which are comparable to modern infectious disease control practices. This historical analysis may inform current epidemic preparedness by highlighting early institutional and community-level interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.