Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507778›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

A genetransfer strategy based on durum wheat-Aegilops comosa amphiploid top-crossed with hexaploid wheat results in elimination of D chromosomes led to the production of homoeologous M(D) substitutions and translocations.

Péter Kovács, András Farkas, Edina Türkösi, Klaudia Kruppa, Éva Szakács, Kitti Szőke-Pázsi, Norbert Hidvégi, Péter Mikó, Andrea Gulyás, Éva Darkó and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Péter Kovács *Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9698-648X
András Farkas *Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary. farkas.andras@atk.hun-ren.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9545-0332
Edina TürkösiHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-8516
Klaudia KruppaHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-3317
Éva SzakácsHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-7833
Kitti Szőke-PázsiHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2186-4681
Norbert HidvégiHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-2724
Péter MikóHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-7415
Andrea GulyásHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-1341
Éva DarkóHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-3655
Mahmoud SaidInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Centre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics, Olomouc, 77900, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-8655
László IvanizsHungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-9729
Eszter Gaál *Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-9656
István Molnár *Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN), Centre for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Institute, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7167-9319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestication and nearly eight thousand years of cultivation have resulted in a narrow genetic base, which hinders the identification of effective allele combinations and hampers breeding progress under changing environmental conditions. The gene portfolio can be extended using a crossing strategy providing favourable conditions for the formation of wheat × alien chromosome addition, substitution and translocation lines. To utilize the gene pool of Aegilops comosa, the present study applied durum wheat–Ae. comosa amphiploids top-crossed (TC) by hexaploid wheat (Mv9kr1ph1b), a strategy exploiting monosomic conditions of D- and M-genomes in TC1 to form cytogenetic stocks.

resultsWhile the expected genome structure of amphiploid and TC1 generations was confirmed, consecutive in situ hybridization using D- and M-genomic, as well as DNA repeat probes on 52 TC2F1 lines, showed significant elimination of not only M- but also D-genome chromosomes. Differences in the elimination frequency seemed to be related to chromosome size, with an opposite tendency for the two genomes, as shorter M chromosomes (1M, 4M, 6M) were retained more frequently, while the shorter D chromosomes (1D, 4D) were predominantly eliminated. D–M rearrangements within group 1, 3, 4, and 6 chromosomes were dominantly homoeologous, with 5D/5M recombinations observed at the highest frequency. Besides monosomic introgressions, disomic substitutions 2M(2D) and 7M(7D), addition 6M, and translocation T6MS·6ML-6D were selected. Morphological characterization and yield components indicated the good compensation ability of these Ae. comosa chromosomes for the loss of those of wheat.

conclusionsRelationships between chromosomes size and their elimination from wheat × alien hybrid progenies were discussed. Based on the high level of homoeologous recombinations and substitutions, top-crossing has proven to be an effective strategy for transferring alien chromosome segments from closely related diploid species into wheat. The newly developed wheat–Ae. comosa prebreeding materials represent potentially valuable genetic resources for wheat improvement.

Indexed as

AegilopsChromosomes, PlantTranslocation, GeneticTriticumCrosses, GeneticGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticPlant BreedingPolyploidyAegilops comosaChromosome eliminationIn situ hybridizationInterspecific hybridizationWheat–Aegilops introgression

Identifiers

PMID41507778
PMCPMC12870346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.