ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Association of EEG Response to Hypertonic Saline and Neurologic Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Brain Injury.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectroencephalography (EEG) is a critical tool for neuromonitoring and neuroprognostication in children with acute brain injury. Quantitative EEG (qEEG), particularly the alpha-delta ratio (ADR), can detect worsening cerebral ischemia in adults, but it is unknown whether it can identify more subtle and transient changes in cerebral blood flow, such as those induced by hypertonic saline (HTS), in children with acute brain injury. We aimed to determine whether we could identify a cohort of patients with an ADR response to HTS and to evaluate the association between an ADR response and neurologic outcomes in critically ill children with acute brain injury.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit with acute brain injury who received HTS during EEG monitoring from 2018 to 2023. The ADR was calculated before and after HTS administration. An ADR response was defined as a > 20% increase from baseline to within 30 min of receiving HTS in either hemisphere. The primary outcome was survival with favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Functional Status Scale score change < 3 from prehospital baseline to discharge. Secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge.
resultsAmong 87 patients (median age 10 years [interquartile range 3.6-14.5], 46% female), 28% (24 of 87) had an ADR response to HTS. ADR responders were older (12.9 vs. 8.0 years; p = 0.004) and more likely to have continuous, normal-voltage EEG backgrounds (67% vs. 40%; p = 0.006). Patients with an ADR response had four times increased odds of favorable outcome and survival (odds ratio [OR] 4.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-12.7] and OR 3.9 [95% CI 1.0-10.7], respectively).
conclusionsAn ADR increase > 20% following HTS was associated with increased odds of survival with favorable neurologic outcome and survival to hospital discharge in critically ill pediatric patients with acute brain injury. qEEG response to HTS may serve as a real-time, noninvasive biomarker of cerebral perfusion responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.