ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Meloxicam Eluting 3D Printed 316L Stainless Steel Implants for Targeted Delivery in Bone Fixation Surgeries.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant failures in orthopedic surgeries can occur due to inflammation, poor osteointegration, and biofilm formation. The local delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs is one of the potential solutions to address orthopedic implant failures caused by extensive inflammation, poor osteointegration, and biofilm formation. This study utilized a simple spray coating technique to deposit multilayer coatings of the anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam and PLGA on 3D printed 316L stainless steel implants. The implants were evaluated for their drug content, drug-polymer miscibility, static contact angle, corrosion resistance, in vitro release, cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and bacterial adhesion studies. The coatings aimed to improve osteointegration and reduce biofilm formation. The drug release studies demonstrated an initial burst release accompanied by sustained release for more than 30 days. The meloxicam-PLGA coated implants showed higher resistance to pitting corrosion, improved adhesion, and proliferation of human U2OS cells in comparison to uncoated implants. In addition, results from cell cytotoxicity studies confirmed that all the coatings are biocompatible and safe for in vivo application. The meloxicam-PLGA coated implants were also found to have significantly lower bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation compared to uncoated implants for both S. aureus (p < 0.01) and S. pseudintermedius (p < 0.01). The multilayer coatings developed in this study have the potential to improve adhesion at the implant-bone interface and thus might prevent implant rejections in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Moreover, this method can be applied to other drugs and polymers to address the issues related to implant failure, pain management, and surgical site infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.