ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
The neurocognitive aspects of empathy and theory of mind in pragmatic language processing.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social communication and brain network properties: cognitive predictors and modulation by autistic traits.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding pragmatic language, such as irony or white lies, requires complex social-cognitive processing. While both empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM) are known contributors, their relevance remains poorly understood. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioral tests to investigate how individual differences in ToM and empathy are associated with neural activation during comprehension of pragmatic language. Forty-five neurotypical adults completed a Contextual Discrepancy Task featuring ironic, literal, white lie, and unrelated statements while undergoing fMRI. Behavioral measures of empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and ToM (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, Short Story Task) were collected. Brain activity was constrained to empathy- and ToM-related regions identified through Neurosynth meta-analyses. Results revealed a shared frontotemporal network, particularly the inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and supramarginal gyrus, supporting all statement types. Regression models showed that ToM, especially its affective components, predicted activation in mentalizing regions, such as the precuneus, angular gyrus, and amygdala. Empathy was linked to signal changes in the insula and supramarginal gyrus, underscoring their role in emotional simulation. The supramarginal gyrus emerged as a convergence zone integrating affective and cognitive contributions across both domains. These findings highlight the integrative and distributed nature of the neural architecture supporting pragmatic language processing, offering insight into how emotion and inference jointly shape communicative interpretation. Implications extend to understanding communicative impairments in clinical populations and informing interventions targeting social-cognitive processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.