ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Exploration vs. Exploitation in a Novel Complex Card Matching Task: Evidence from Pupillometry.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exploration-exploitation tradeoff describes the cognitive balance between exploring novel options and exploiting known strategies to optimize decision-making. The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system has been implicated in regulating this tradeoff, with phasic and tonic LC activity linked to exploitation and exploration, respectively. Pupillometry provides a noninvasive measure of LC activity, with pretrial pupil size reflecting tonic activity and task-evoked pupil responses indicating phasic activity. In this study, we investigated how pupillary dynamics track transitions between exploration and exploitation in a novel cognitive paradigm, the Complex Card Matching Task (CCMT). The CCMT was designed to elicit clear exploratory and exploitative behaviors while incorporating two difficulty levels to assess task-related cognitive demands. Our findings showed that exploration was consistently associated with larger pupil size than exploitation in both pretrial and task-evoked periods, suggesting heightened LC-NE activity during uncertain decision-making. Importantly, task difficulty moderated these effects during exploitation, with larger pupils observed in the Hard condition, reflecting the increased cognitive effort required to maintain complex rules to make a decision. By contrast, exploration was unaffected by difficulty, indicating a stable arousal signature of rule discovery across task demands. The pupil dynamics observed in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff highlight the complexity of this process, suggesting that while exploration involves a consistent baseline of elevated arousal, exploitation is more sensitive to task difficulty. The CCMT provided a clear distinction between exploration and exploitation, reinforcing its value for investigating cognitive flexibility and decision-making processes. Our findings contribute to understanding the neural and physiological mechanisms underlying the exploration-exploitation tradeoff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507653What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.