ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026
Metabolic syndrome in Australia: nationwide survey results by remoteness and Indigenous status, 2012-2019.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Australia, the rising prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) presents a significant public health challenge. However, research on geographic and ethnic disparities remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and temporal trends of MetS by geographic remoteness and between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.
methodsWe analysed data from 44,760 adults (aged ≥18 years) derived from the National Health Survey (2014-2015 and 2017-2018) and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (2012-2013 and 2018-2019). Weighted prevalence estimates of MetS were calculated overall and stratified by remoteness. The Average Annual Rate of Change (AARC) in MetS prevalence was computed to assess temporal trends.
resultsMetS prevalence varied notably by remoteness and ethnicity. In the most recent surveys, 7.1% (95% CI: 6.19-8.19) of Indigenous adults (2018-2019) and 4.6% (95% CI: 4.23-4.99) of non-Indigenous adults (2017-2018) had MetS. Prevalence was higher in remote areas for both groups. Among non-Indigenous adults, MetS declined across most regions but increased in remote areas from 4.5% to 7.1% (AARC: +15.77%), while among Indigenous adults it remained stable in remote areas but rose in major cities and regional settings. Central obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) were the most prominent contributors to MetS among Indigenous adults, whereas hypertension and high cholesterol were more prevalent among non-Indigenous adults in regional areas. Central obesity was the most common MetS risk factor, affecting 57.4% (95% CI: 55.14-59.63) of Indigenous and 40.9% (95% CI: 39.90-41.85) of non-Indigenous adults. High cholesterol was the least common risk factor among Indigenous adults (7.6% [95% CI: 6.58-8.67]), whereas elevated blood sugar was the least common among non-Indigenous adults (4.8% [95% CI: 4.44-5.21]).
conclusionsSubstantial disparities in MetS exist across Australia, disproportionately affecting Indigenous Australians and residents of remote areas. Culturally tailored, region-specific interventions targeting obesity are urgently needed through Local Health Districts and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.