ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Insights from 2057 germline genetic tests in renal cell carcinoma patients support revisiting testing criteria.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arises sporadically or in a hereditary context, with inherited cases accounting for less than 10%, depending on the genes analyzed. Next-generation sequencing has enabled the use of multigene panels (MGP) to characterize RCC linked to hereditary syndromes. The current French guidelines of the national reference network for hereditary renal cancers (PREDIR) recommend genetic testing for patients meeting specific clinical criteria. This study evaluates the diagnostic yield and the relevance of current criteria, the utility of MGP testing, and the added value of tumor analyses. We retrospectively analyzed 2057 RCC patients who underwent germline MGP testing across three French hospital laboratories. Tumor analysis results from 140 patients were also evaluated. The overall rate of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was 3.5%, with 39% in syndromic cases and 1.2% in apparently sporadic cases. Tumor analyses identified somatic pathogenic variants in 56.3% of cases. Our data support that the likelihood of identifying a germline PV is low in patients with sporadic single clear cell RCC, and that the clinical utility of testing all patients with other sporadic subtypes appears limited. This suggests a need to revise current testing criteria in patients with sporadic single RCC, for example, by lowering the age threshold for genetic testing from 45 to 40 years in clear cell RCC, and to 50 years in other subtypes. We also suggest incorporating tumor analyses to distinguish hereditary RCC from sporadic cases driven by tumor-specific pathogenic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.