ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Evaluation of an Antifungal Agent Against Nakaseomyces Glabratus in the in Vivo Model Galleria Mellonella.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical management of Nakaseomyces glabratus is becoming increasingly difficult because of its intrinsic and acquired resistance to multiple antifungal drugs, particularly azoles. This situation highlights the urgent need for new antifungal agents. In this study, the antifungal efficacy and toxicity profile of an organometallic compound, named FE1, was evaluated in the in vivo model Galleria mellonella infection model. Larvae were inoculated with a standardized suspension of N. glabratus CBS138 and treated with FE1 or fluconazole at different concentrations (0.4, 4.0, and 20 mg/kg). Survival and fungal burden (CFU/larva) were monitored at defined time points post-inoculation (24, 120 and 360 h). The results obtained in this study show that the model of N. glabratus infection in G. mellonella is suitable to evaluate toxicity, antifungal efficacy and evolution of the infection in response to antifungal treatments. In this context, compound FE1 showed significant antifungal activity, superior to that of fluconazole in parameters evaluated, such as survival and fungal burden, while melanization was monitored as a qualitative visual indicator of infection progression. The dose-dependent response observed in both survival and CFU/larva reduction assays, together with the complete protection in the groups treated with 20 mg/kg FE1 suggests a high therapeutic potential of this compound against N. glabratus infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.