Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2026
Effects of personalized vitamin D
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Nutraceuticals and Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: A Scoping Review of Human Studies on Nutrigenomic-Based Interventions.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Potential value of vitamin D as adjunctive therapy in osteoarticular tuberculosis: a comprehensive review.Infection · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow vitamin D status and inflammation are associated with poor prognosis among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We assessed the efficacy of personalized vitamin D
methodsIn an ongoing randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Germany, CRC patients who underwent surgery in the past year and had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels < 60 nmol/L were randomly assigned to either a personalized loading dose of VIDS, followed by a maintenance dose of 2000 IU/day or a placebo for 12 weeks. Changes in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-1) were compared at the end of trial among 126 patients (65 in the placebo and 61 in the intervention group).
resultsThe VIDS group exhibited 39.3% reduction in IL-6 levels compared to the placebo group (95% CI: -54.9% to -18.2%; p = 0.001). The reductions observed in IFN-γ and MMP-1 due to VIDS were not statistically significant (-6.7%; p = 0.69 and -5.4%; p = 0.23, respectively).
conclusionIn CRC patients with low vitamin D status, VIDS reduces serum IL-6, a pro-inflammatory biomarker associated with poor prognosis. Further research should explore a potential supportive therapeutic role of VIDS in managing inflammation and improving CRC outcomes. [Words: 200].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.