Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507558›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Part-whole effects in visual number estimation.

Chenxiao Guan, David Schwitzgebel, Chaz Firestone, Alon Hafri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenxiao Guan *Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. chenxiaoguan@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-3212
David Schwitzgebel *Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-767X
Chaz FirestoneDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-2422
Alon HafriDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. alon@udel.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-8690

Funding

Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCS-2021053National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400854SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities SMA-2105228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a single glance at a collection of objects, we can appreciate their numerosity. But what are the "objects" over which this number sense operates? Most work in this domain has implicitly assumed that we estimate the number of discrete, bounded individuals actually present in the visual field. However, in many instances we can construe such individuals as potential parts of composite objects that they can create-as when we assemble furniture or complete a jigsaw puzzle. Here, we demonstrate that visual numerosity estimation is sensitive to such part-whole relations, such that the number of items in a display is underestimated when it contains spatially separated but easily combinable objects. Participants saw brief displays containing noncontiguous "puzzle-piece" stimuli, and reported which display had more pieces. Crucially, most of the pieces appeared in pairs that either could or could not efficiently combine into new objects. In four experiments, displays with combinable pieces were judged as less numerous than displays with noncombinable pieces-as if the mind treated two geometrically compatible pieces as being the single whole object they could create. These effects went beyond various low-level factors, and they persisted even when participants were explicitly trained to treat individual pieces as the units that should be counted. Thus, despite the many ways that sets of objects may be construed for the purposes of counting, visual perception automatically takes into account the ways that object parts may combine into wholes when extracting numerosity from visual displays.

Indexed as

AttentionJudgmentMathematicsPattern Recognition, VisualHumansYoung AdultANSApproximate number systemPerceptionPossibilityShapeVisual relations

Identifiers

PMID41507558
PMCPMC12783196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.