SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Acupuncture as treatment of cancer-therapy induced fatigue: a critical systematic review with a focus on the methodological assessment of blinding.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcupuncture is a method of traditional Chinese medicine that has been adapted in the Western world. The objective of this study was to critically assess the evidence presented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effectiveness of acupuncture on fatigue in cancer patients.
methodIn April 2024 a systematic search was conducted searching five electronic databases to find studies concerning the use, effectiveness and potential harm of acupuncture therapy on cancer patients.
resultsFrom all (1599) search results, 15 studies with 1346 patients were included. Acupuncture methods varied (e.g., traditional-, electro-, mind-regulating and ATAS-acupuncture) and were compared to sham acupuncture, usual care, or other controls. Studies comparing acupuncture to sham acupuncture reported mixed results: while some found significant effects on cancer-related fatigue, others found no advantages. Studies comparing acupuncture to usual care or waitlist controls often reported positive effects. However, the reliability of these findings is limited, as 14 of 15 studies were rated as "high risk of bias" by the RoB-2 tool due to issues like insufficient blinding and incomplete data analysis. Only one study, with low risk of bias, showed a significant reduction in fatigue with acupuncture compared to sham acupuncture (p < 0.001). GRADE evaluation also showed very low certainty of evidence.
conclusionThe heterogenous results and methodological limitations of the existing studies prevent us from drawing definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of cancer-related fatigue. Despite the inclusion of 15 studies, the overall evidence remains insufficient due to widespread problems in study design and inconsistent results. This analysis highlights the need to use more rigorous designs and more comprehensive assessment tools in future studies to better understand the role of acupuncture in the management of fatigue after cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.