ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Genicular Artery Embolization as a Treatment Option for Refractory Knee Pain Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Series.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genicular Artery Embolization for Chronic Knee Pain: Expert Consensus Recommendations on Indications, Technique and Clinical Care Using a Delphi Process.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examines the efficacy of genicular artery embolization (GAE) as a treatment to reduce chronic knee pain in patients who have previously undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-seven consecutive patients (13 men and 24 women) with a history of persistent pain for at least one year after TKA underwent GAE at a single center. The mean age across all patients was 72.8 ± 9.7 years, and the mean BMI was 29.3 ± 6.1 kg/m
resultsAmong 37 patients, WOMAC scores at the preliminary, one-month, and three-month follow-up appointments were 64% ± 6%, 39% ± 8%, and 36% ± 8%, respectively (95% CI). VAS scores were 8.1 ± 0.6, 3.2 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.0 (95% CI). A paired t-test showed a statistically significant improvement at both one-month and three-month post-procedure evaluations. (p < 0.05). Overall, 64.9% (n = 24) of patients achieved at least a 50% improvement in pain scores by the end of the study term.
conclusionGAE shows efficacy as an adjunct treatment in patients with TKA and long-standing pain (> 1 year). Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes and broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.