Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507462›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Root-associated protein prediction using a protein large language model and hypergraph convolutional networks.

Lei Chen, Xingyu Xun, Bo Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China. lchen@shmtu.edu.cn.
Xingyu XunCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Bo ZhouSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant root-associated proteins promote plant growth and enhance stress tolerance. They participate in signaling and plant growth regulation. It is clear that they play key roles in plant growth, development and environmental adaptation. At present, the root-associated proteins have not been fully discovered. It is essential to identify latent root-associated proteins. Traditional methods (proteomic analysis, transcriptome and expression analysis) for determining root-associated proteins are highly relied on the data generated by biochemical experiments, which are always expensive and time-consuming. On the other hand, the current computational models show weak ability, providing great spaces for improvement. In this study, we propose a new computational model, Hypergraph-Root, for predicting root-associated proteins. The model employed several feature types to represent proteins, which were derived from proteins BLOSUM62 and position-specific scoring matrices as well as by a protein language model. These features were improved by hypergraph convolutional network and multi-head attention. The final predicted result was yielded by a fully connected layer. The model yielded high performance with AUC about 0.9 on training and independent datasets. It had evident advantages compared with existing models. Some additional tests were conducted to prove the rationality of the model's structure.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPlant ProteinsPlant RootsConvolutional Neural NetworksLarge Language ModelsPrediction AlgorithmsProteomicsPlant ProteinsBLOSUM62 matrixDeep learningHypergraphPosition-specific scoring matrixProtein classificationProtT5

Identifiers

PMID41507462
PMCPMC12873345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.