ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
The DIGIT-HF trial and the Mihai Gheorghiade legacy: time to reconsider cardiac glycosides as effective therapy in HFrEF.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: integrating diagnostic pathways, revascularization strategies, and guideline-directed therapy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Na/K-ATPase in the renal proximal tubule cell: classic & novel roles in sodium handling.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac glycosides have been used for more than two centuries in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use has steadily declined in recent decades, largely due to safety concerns raised by observational studies and the availability of outcome-modifying therapies with more favorable safety profiles. Evidence from earlier randomized trials suggested that digoxin improves symptoms and reduces heart-failure hospitalizations without affecting survival, but these studies were conducted before the widespread adoption of contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Digitoxin is a cardiac glycoside that differs from digoxin through its hepatic clearance and more stable pharmacokinetics, diminishing the impact of renal dysfunction and serum concentration fluctuations, thereby improving safety and facilitating long-term use in routine care. Here, we critically discuss in the context of available evidence the findings of the recently published DIGIT-HF (Digitoxin to Improve Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure) trial, which for the first time evaluated the efficacy and safety of digitoxin in contemporary patients with HFrEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.