ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026
Characterising Maternal Sensitivity in a High Risk, Peri-urban LMIC Context: The Drakenstein Child Health Study.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Planetary health in practice: A scoping review of education and training for nurses and midwives.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A prolific amount of data regarding maternal sensitivity and child development outcomes comes from high income, industrialised western contexts. Sparse attention has been paid to characterising patterns or unique expressions of sensitivity as an independent topic of study globally with a glaring dearth of comparative data from LMICs including sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to detail maternal sensitivity within the dyadic interaction between mother and her 42-month-old child (n = 130) in a peri-urban low socioeconomic context as part of the Drakenstein Child Health Study. Ten-minute videoed interactions were coded using the Emotional Availability Scale. We found no report of psychometric properties and applicability of the EA in our context, therefore confirmatory followed by exploratory factor analysis on the four maternal subscales was conducted. EFA using scree plot and parallel analysis extracted a 3 factor model that better fit our data than the original four. Factor 1-Sensitive Engagement, Factor 2-Non-Hostile Supportive Engagement and Factor 3-Non-Intrusive Engagement aligned theoretically with the original maternal subscales. The new Sensitive Engagement subscale accounted for 25% cohort variance and mothers showed varied distribution over five categories ranging from Highly Sensitive to Highly Insensitive. Cumulatively, 59% of total variance is explained by 3 factors - Factor 2-22% and Factor 3-12%. Significantly, our cohort shows remarkably resilient sensitivity patterns and behaviours considering the extremely harsh and challenging environments in which they must raise children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41507427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.