Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507427›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026

Characterising Maternal Sensitivity in a High Risk, Peri-urban LMIC Context: The Drakenstein Child Health Study.

Anita Prag, Nadia Hoffman, Juliet Stromin, Heather Zar, Dan J Stein, Susan Malcolm Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anita PragACSENT Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. praganita@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1325-3651
Nadia HoffmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-1416
Juliet StrominUniversity of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-488X
Heather ZarUniversity of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9046-759X
Dan J SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-7810
Susan Malcolm SmithACSENT Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-3919

Funding

Gates Foundation,United States OPP1017641, OPP1017579Welcome Trust 221372/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prolific amount of data regarding maternal sensitivity and child development outcomes comes from high income, industrialised western contexts. Sparse attention has been paid to characterising patterns or unique expressions of sensitivity as an independent topic of study globally with a glaring dearth of comparative data from LMICs including sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to detail maternal sensitivity within the dyadic interaction between mother and her 42-month-old child (n = 130) in a peri-urban low socioeconomic context as part of the Drakenstein Child Health Study. Ten-minute videoed interactions were coded using the Emotional Availability Scale. We found no report of psychometric properties and applicability of the EA in our context, therefore confirmatory followed by exploratory factor analysis on the four maternal subscales was conducted. EFA using scree plot and parallel analysis extracted a 3 factor model that better fit our data than the original four. Factor 1-Sensitive Engagement, Factor 2-Non-Hostile Supportive Engagement and Factor 3-Non-Intrusive Engagement aligned theoretically with the original maternal subscales. The new Sensitive Engagement subscale accounted for 25% cohort variance and mothers showed varied distribution over five categories ranging from Highly Sensitive to Highly Insensitive. Cumulatively, 59% of total variance is explained by 3 factors - Factor 2-22% and Factor 3-12%. Significantly, our cohort shows remarkably resilient sensitivity patterns and behaviours considering the extremely harsh and challenging environments in which they must raise children.

Indexed as

Child developmentEmotional availability scale psychometricMaternal sensitivitySensitivity patternsSub-Saharan africa and LMIC’s

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.