ArticleScientific reports2026
Ecological risk and source apportionment of heavy metals in riparian soil and sediment of an urban river in a developing country.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no universally accepted safe level of heavy metals in the river watershed’s riparian soil and sediment in Bangladesh. To assess contamination, sources, and ecological risks of heavy metals in surface sediment and riparian soil of the most polluted urban river (Buriganga) in Bangladesh. A total of 45 surface sediment and 45 riparian soil samples were collected from the study river, and metals were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). The mean values were observed as 59.2, 42.6, 88.5, 15.1, 6.4, 42.9, 12676.3, 55.0, and 129.0 mg/kg in riparian soil and 183.7, 134.4, 233.6, 22.2, 9.9, 155.4, 15860.3, 170.1, and 203.7 mg/kg in sediment, respectively for Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Cd, Pb, Fe, Mn, and Zn. Ecotoxicological estimation portrayed moderate pollution of heavy metals in the riparian soil and sediment of the Buriganga River. Most of the evaluated metals originated from anthropogenic sources (industrial and agricultural activities) rather than geogenic sources, and caused the severity of contamination of the river ecosystem. Heavy metals estimated in this study could provide reliable information for effective risk assessment of heavy metals in the urban area to maintain river health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.