ArticleScientific reports2026
Rubber voice illusion exposed neural correlates of voice perception and vocal adaptation across the continuum of psychosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rubber Voice Illusion is an auditory analogue of the classic Rubber Hand Illusion, a “mind-trick” for the voice. When speakers hear a stranger’s utterances that are perfectly time‑locked and syllable‑matched to their own voice, many momentarily adopt that alien voice as self‑generated. We used this illusion to probe the integrity of predictive auditory mechanisms across the psychosis continuum. Sixty healthy adults completed three Talk‑Listen conditions while high‑density EEG was recorded: veridical (live playback of own voice), stranger‑match (congruent stranger voice) and stranger‑mismatch (incongruent). Behaviorally, only the congruent condition evoked a sense of Ownership and Agency over the stranger’s voice, paired with an upward shift in fundamental frequency toward the higher-pitched stranger voice - an implicit indication of voice adaptation. Neurophysiologically, the canonical speaking-induced suppression was replicated, and suppression was significantly smaller in participants who scored high on Peters et al. Delusions Inventory. In controls, greater pitch shift was associated with stronger neural suppression, suggesting a functioning self-suppression mechanism; conversely, in high-schizotypy individuals, the relationship reversed, despite pitch shifting toward the stranger’s pitch, they exhibited reduced suppression, indicating decoupling between motor output and sensory prediction. The study provides further evidence to the intricate relationship of neural mechanisms underlying self-generated actions with sensory processing in the psychosis continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.