ArticleScientific reports2026
Employing artificial intelligence to predict δ¹⁸O and δ²H isotope ratios in precipitation in Iraq under changing climate patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ensemble machine learning method for δScientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding precipitation dynamics in arid regions such as Iraq is of paramount importance in hydrological and climatological studies, as it is a key approach to water resources management and climate change adaptation. This study aims to develop a mathematical predictive model for rainfall isotopic values using machine learning techniques. Stable isotope data for oxygen (δ¹⁸O) and deuterium (δ²H) in precipitation were collected from 32 meteorological stations distributed across Iraq over a 14-year period (2010–2024). The dataset also included meteorological parameters for these stations, including precipitation amount, air temperature, relative humidity, and calculated station elevation. Several machine learning algorithms (i.e., SVM, GBR, ANN, CatBoost, XGBoost, and RF) were employed to compare predicted isotopic values with actual readings, accounting for rainfall characteristics and patterns. The results demonstrated that the RF model achieved superior predictive performance, with a calibration coefficient (R²) of 0.89 in the testing set, indicating strong predictive capability. This model also recorded the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.39 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.5 compared to the other algorithms, reflecting improved predictive accuracy. These findings confirm the effectiveness of integrating machine learning, particularly the RF approach, in enhancing the modeling of isotopic signature predictions in environmental studies. Furthermore, they highlight the potential of AI-based models as powerful tools for reconstructing historical isotopic datasets, supporting climate variability assessment and sustainable water resources management in arid and semi-arid regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.