ArticleScientific reports2026
A multiobjective human evolutionary optimization algorithm for complex engineering problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) demand algorithms that effectively balance convergence, diversity, and computational efficiency. To address this challenge, a novel Multi-Objective Human Evolutionary Optimization Algorithm (MOHEOA) is proposed, inspired by the dynamics of human societal evolution. MOHEOA structures the search process into two adaptive phases: human exploration and human development, integrating a fixed-size dynamic archive to maintain and utilize non-dominated Pareto solutions. The algorithm begins with a logistic chaos mapping for population initialization, ensuring robust diversity. During the development phase, individuals are classified into leaders, explorers, followers, and losers, each employing specialized strategies tailored for multi-objective search. A roulette-wheel selection mechanism dynamically selects leaders from the archive, optimizing the trade-off between exploration and exploitation. To validate MOHEOA’s performance, extensive experiments on twenty-three benchmark test functions and four real-world engineering design problems are conducted. Comparative evaluations against state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithms demonstrate that MOHEOA consistently outperforms competitors in convergence speed, solution diversity, and Pareto optimality. The algorithm’s robustness and adaptability make it a compelling choice for complex optimization tasks. For reproducibility and further research, the MATLAB implementation of MOHEOA is publicly available at: https://github.com/swatzash/MOHEOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.