Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Soil carbon, micronutrients and microbiological dynamics under cash crop-based cropping systems in semi-arid National Capital Region of India.

Preeti, Sunita Sheoran, Dhram Prakash, Ankit, Todarmal, Sonia Rani, Rameshwar Singh, Parmod Kumar Yadav, Rajni Kant Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Preeti *Department of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Sunita Sheoran *Department of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Dhram Prakash *Department of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India. dhramprakashteotia@gmail.com.
Ankit *Department of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
TodarmalDepartment of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Sonia RaniDepartment of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Rameshwar SinghDepartment of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Parmod Kumar YadavDepartment of Soil Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Rajni Kant SharmaDepartment of Chemistry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cropping systems and nutrient management practices potentially alter microbiological properties and nutrients bioavailability in soils. This study evaluated the footprints of prevalent cash crops-based cropping systems at farmers’ fields (> 10 years) on total carbon (TC), total inorganic carbon (TIC), soil organic carbon (SOC), micronutrients as well as biological activities. The soils faced rice–wheat (RW) cropping system exhibited significant accrual in SOC (29.16%) over pearl millet-wheat (PW). Higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content was obtained in soils from sugarcane-sugarcane (SS) mono-cropping with a magnitude of 4.75, 9.01, 11.71 and 45.35% with respect to PW, RW, cotton-wheat (CW) and pearl millet-mustard (PM), respectively. Accretion of TIC (4.92 g kg−1) and TC (11.26 g kg−1) contents were acquired in soils experienced PM and SS cropping systems, respectively. DTPA-extractable micronutrients except copper (Cu) were found in higher concentration under RW compared to other cropping systems. In soils of RW cropping system, SOC, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and DTPA-extractable Zn, Mn and Fe were higher by 3.33 to 58.97, 1.94 to 27.40, 23.81 to 51.59, 12.12 to 85.00, 25.73 to 58.05 and 15.17 to 83.44%, over other persisted systems. Despite the lesser chemical fertilization and manure addition, soils faced SS mono-cropping statistically reflected similar values to RW cropping system for most of studied properties. Two main canonical discriminant functions (CDFs), based on SOC, DOC, TIC, TC, DTPA-extractable micronutrients (Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu), MBC and DHA, clearly differentiated the cropping systems and both CDFs explained 92.3% variance of the total variation. Principal component analysis (PCA) picked out MBC, SOC, pH and EC as most influential variables in evaluating soil status across various cropping systems. Additionally, two principal components (PCs) explained 73.7% of total variance in original dataset, underscored the major factors influencing soil properties under varied cropping techniques. Among the studied cropping systems, RW was found superior in relation to the soil microbial activity and nutrient availability. However, SS mono-cropping also exhibited comparable results to RW and proved better over other aerobic cropping systems, especially in terms of carbon dynamics and microbiological properties of soils.

Indexed as

AgricultureCarbonCrops, AgriculturalMicronutrientsSoilSoil MicrobiologyBiomassIndiaOryzaPennisetumTriticumCarbonMicronutrientsSoilBiological activityCropping systemMicronutrientSoil carbon fraction

Identifiers

PMID41507271
PMCPMC12873209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.