ArticleScientific data2026
The Multi-Sensor and Multi-Temporal Dataset of Multiple Crops for In-Field Phenotyping and Monitoring.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dataset of Temporally Consistent Instance Annotations for 4D Plant Phenotyping.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Harnessing plant-exuded prebiotics as a next-generation strategy for sustainable agriculture.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Ground Mobile Robots for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review from the Closed-Loop Perspective of Perception, Decision, and Action.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Multi-Sensor and Multi-Temporal Dataset of Multiple Crops for In-Field Phenotyping and Monitoring.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenotyping is crucial for understanding crop trait variation and advancing research, but is currently limited by expensive, labor-intensive monitoring. New phenotypic trait monitoring methods are being proposed to reduce this so-called phenotyping bottleneck via automation. These methods are often data-driven, requiring a dataset recorded with a specific sensor and corresponding reference values for developing novel methods. To this end, we present the MuST-C (Multi-Sensor, multi-Temporal, multiple Crops) dataset, which contains field data from various sensors collected over a growing season, covering six crop species. All data was georeferenced for alignment across sensors and dates. To collect our dataset, we deployed aerial and ground robotic platforms equipped with RGB cameras, LiDARs, and multispectral cameras, aiming to capture a wide variety of modalities and observations from different viewpoints. In addition to sensor data, we also provide manually collected leaf area index and biomass reference measurements. Our dataset enables the development of novel automatic phenotypic trait estimation methods, allows comparisons across different sensors, and generalizability across crop species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.