Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507213›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

The Multi-Sensor and Multi-Temporal Dataset of Multiple Crops for In-Field Phenotyping and Monitoring.

Yue Linn Chong, Julie Krämer, Erekle Chakhvashvili, Elias Marks, Felix Esser, Ansgar Dreier, Radu Alexandru Rosu, Kevin Warstat, Ralf Pude, Sven Behnke and 6 more

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yue Linn ChongCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany. linn.chong@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5851-953X
Julie KrämerInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Erekle ChakhvashviliInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Elias MarksCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Felix EsserInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Ansgar DreierInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Radu Alexandru RosuDepartment for Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Kevin WarstatInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Ralf PudeInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural, Nutritional and Engineering Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sven BehnkeDepartment for Computer Science, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Onno MullerInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-5632
Uwe RascherInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428, Jülich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-4588
Heiner KuhlmannCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9758-7721
Cyrill StachnissCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1173-6972
Jens BehleyCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Lasse KlingbeilCenter for Robotics, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-150X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC-2070-390732324 - PhenoRob
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotyping is crucial for understanding crop trait variation and advancing research, but is currently limited by expensive, labor-intensive monitoring. New phenotypic trait monitoring methods are being proposed to reduce this so-called phenotyping bottleneck via automation. These methods are often data-driven, requiring a dataset recorded with a specific sensor and corresponding reference values for developing novel methods. To this end, we present the MuST-C (Multi-Sensor, multi-Temporal, multiple Crops) dataset, which contains field data from various sensors collected over a growing season, covering six crop species. All data was georeferenced for alignment across sensors and dates. To collect our dataset, we deployed aerial and ground robotic platforms equipped with RGB cameras, LiDARs, and multispectral cameras, aiming to capture a wide variety of modalities and observations from different viewpoints. In addition to sensor data, we also provide manually collected leaf area index and biomass reference measurements. Our dataset enables the development of novel automatic phenotypic trait estimation methods, allows comparisons across different sensors, and generalizability across crop species.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPhenotypePlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID41507213
PMCPMC12796333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.