ArticleScientific data2026
A Multimodal Dataset for Assessing Emotion, Stress, and Emotional Workload in Interpersonal Work Scenario.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting and Improving Human Cognitive State in Real-Time Using Data-Driven Adaptive Systems: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Multimodal Dataset for Assessing Emotion, Stress, and Emotional Workload in Interpersonal Work Scenario.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present EmoWork, a multimodal, multi-label dataset designed to support emotion and stress detection in realistic interpersonal work settings. Interpersonal work-common in occupations such as customer service-often requires workers to regulate their emotional expressions in response to strong affective stimuli. These demands, shaped by organizational display rules, present a unique challenge for affective computing systems, particularly in scenarios where internal emotional states diverge from observable behaviors. Despite this, no public datasets exist that capture such dynamics of affect in naturalistic settings. To address this gap, we collected physiological, behavioral, and self-reported data from call center workers who engaged in role-play scenarios simulating customer service interactions with professional actors portraying dissatisfied customers. The dataset includes self-reported affective ratings, which are used as labels for classification, synchronized recordings from three wearable devices (i.e., Polar H10, Empatica E4, and Muse S), and features extracted from video and audio data. The EmoWork dataset advances affective computing by offering context-rich, multimodal data grounded in realistic interpersonal work scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.