SynthesisNature communications2026
Critical thresholds for co-benefits of carbon accumulation and biodiversity conservation under global nitrogen enrichment.
Synthesis in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global nitrogen (N) enrichment promotes soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation but often causes biodiversity loss in plants and soil microbes, creating a central challenge for achieving co-benefits of carbon accumulation and biodiversity conservation. The extent to which biodiversity contributes to SOC accumulation, and how these trade-offs can be mitigated under N enrichment remains poorly understood. Here, we conduct a global meta-analysis of N enrichment experiments encompassing 2141 observations from 275 studies to evaluate the contributions of plant, bacterial, and fungal diversity to SOC accumulation and to determine associated ecological thresholds. Our findings indicate that biodiversity, especially in plant communities, is the most important factor for SOC accumulation. We identify three distinct N thresholds characterized by different ecological responses: biodiversity loss accelerates at 50 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, soil degradation persists at 200 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, and SOC accumulation declines beyond this point. Given that the promoting effects of bacterial, fungal, and plant diversity on SOC diminish or even reverse at 50, 67, and 74 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, respectively, we suggest limiting fertilization to around 50 kg N ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, as the trade-off between biodiversity loss and SOC accumulation under N enrichment is potentially minimized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.