ArticleNature communications2026
Computational and neural mechanisms underlying the influence of action affordances on value learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational and neural mechanisms underlying the influence of action affordances on value learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When encountering a novel situation, an intelligent agent must identify which actions are most beneficial for interacting with that environment. One purported mechanism for narrowing down the scope of possible actions is action affordance. Here, we examine the neuro-computational mechanisms accounting for how action affordance shapes value-based learning in a novel environment by combining a novel behavioral task with computational modeling of human behavioral and fMRI data. Our findings indicate that action affordance operates as an independent system that concurrently guides action-selection alongside value-based decision-making rather than simply exerting an initial or persistent bias on value-driven choices. These two systems engage in a competitive process to determine final action selection, governed by a dynamic meta controller. We find that the pre-supplementary motor area and anterior cingulate cortex play a central role in exerting meta-control over the two systems. Meanwhile, the posterior parietal cortex integrates the predictions from these two controllers to determine which action to select. As a result, the action-selection process dynamically takes into account both the expected value and the appropriateness of particular actions for a given scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.