Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507175›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Computational and neural mechanisms underlying the influence of action affordances on value learning.

Sanghyun Yi, John P O'Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanghyun YiDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA. syi@caltech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-6523
John P O'DohertyDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, 91125, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-3531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When encountering a novel situation, an intelligent agent must identify which actions are most beneficial for interacting with that environment. One purported mechanism for narrowing down the scope of possible actions is action affordance. Here, we examine the neuro-computational mechanisms accounting for how action affordance shapes value-based learning in a novel environment by combining a novel behavioral task with computational modeling of human behavioral and fMRI data. Our findings indicate that action affordance operates as an independent system that concurrently guides action-selection alongside value-based decision-making rather than simply exerting an initial or persistent bias on value-driven choices. These two systems engage in a competitive process to determine final action selection, governed by a dynamic meta controller. We find that the pre-supplementary motor area and anterior cingulate cortex play a central role in exerting meta-control over the two systems. Meanwhile, the posterior parietal cortex integrates the predictions from these two controllers to determine which action to select. As a result, the action-selection process dynamically takes into account both the expected value and the appropriateness of particular actions for a given scenario.

Indexed as

LearningBrain MappingChoice BehaviorComputer SimulationDecision MakingFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor CortexParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID41507175
PMCPMC12852110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.