ReviewBlood cancer journal2026
First-line treatment for CLL in the era of targeted therapy.
Review in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Second Primary Malignancies in Patients With B-Cell Lymphomas Treated With Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of haematology · 2026Pooled it
- Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Zanubrutinib vs Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib in Treatment-Naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 6-Year Follow-Up.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Optic nerve infiltration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with acalabrutinib monotherapy: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- TRAF1 S146 is constitutively phosphorylated in OP9-cultured primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by PKN1/2.ImmunoHorizons · 2026Article
- Regional Standardization of CLL Management: Results of a Delphi Consensus Process.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Surrogate Endpoints in CLL: From Promise and Pitfalls to a Context-Specific Validation Framework.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- The novel agent VP79s synergistically enhances venetoclax activity in multiple myeloma cells.Investigational new drugs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the decade since FDA approval of the first-generation Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib, the treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has transformed. Targeted agents, as monotherapy or in combination regimens, have decisively replaced chemoimmunotherapy as the standard of care. In national CLL guidelines updated from 2023 through 2025 - including those from France, Germany, and the US - chemoimmunotherapy is considered a treatment option in only exceptional cases, reflecting broad consensus among experts that targeted therapies should be used universally in the management of previously untreated CLL. The primary first-line treatment options for CLL comprise continuous therapies based on the BTK inhibitors ibrutinib, zanubrutinib, or acalabrutinib, or fixed-duration regimens combining the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax with obinutuzumab or the BTK inhibitors ibrutinib or acalabrutinib (with or without obinutuzumab). Selecting the appropriate targeted therapy requires careful evaluation of a multitude of factors, including molecular disease features (especially del[17p]/TP53 and IGHV mutational status), comorbidities, comedications, and the patient's preferences. Focusing on primary treatment options, we review data from the key controlled trials that support the first-line use of targeted therapies for patients with CLL, consider ongoing trials that may support clinical decision-making in the future, and assess the potential to personalize treatment regimens in CLL based on minimal residual disease status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.