ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Navigating complexity: review and updates of endometriosis and adenomyosis imaging.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Surgical management of endometriosis: indications, patient preparation, and perioperative planning: Number 6 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Article
- Adolescent and Early-Onset Adenomyosis: Phenotypes, Diagnostic Challenges, and Fertility-Conscious Care.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis and adenomyosis are prevalent chronic inflammatory conditions that significantly impact reproductive-age women, leading to debilitating symptoms such as pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and infertility. Endometriosis is characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterus, while adenomyosis involves endometrial deposits within the myometrium, often causing overlapping symptoms. Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management, yet challenges persist due to variability in lesion location and presentation. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of these conditions. While transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) remains a reliable first-line tool with high specificity, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior sensitivity, particularly for endometriomas and deep endometriosis. Both modalities have their limitations but are complementary in preoperative assessment and treatment planning. Emerging imaging protocols, classification systems, and advancements such as dynamic TVUS and improved MRI techniques are discussed. Despite significant progress, the lack of a universally accepted classification system and standardized imaging protocols highlights the need for further research. Advancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies through imaging holds promise for improving patient outcomes. This article reviews the pathophysiology, staging and subtypes of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Recent society guidelines are addressed and readers are provided with updates on imaging technologies with insights into future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.