Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41506911›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026

Representation learning of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze, Florian Barkmann, Jan Lause, Valentina Boeva, Dmitry Kobak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze *Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-068X
Florian Barkmann *Institute for Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1317-8177
Jan Lause *Hertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0946-412X
Valentina BoevaInstitute for Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland valentina.boeva@inf.ethz.ch dmitry.kobak@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4382-7185
Dmitry KobakHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany valentina.boeva@inf.ethz.ch dmitry.kobak@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-7209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a cornerstone experimental technique in tissue biology, with gene expression data for over 100 million cells available in public repositories. The high dimensionality, sparsity, and technical noise inherent to scRNA-seq data have motivated the development of a broad spectrum of representation learning approaches. These methods learn compressed, lower-dimensional representations of single-cell transcriptomes that are meant to preserve essential variation while reducing noise, and can be used for clustering, visualization, trajectory inference, and other downstream tasks. Furthermore, methods have emerged that aim to integrate data from multiple experiments by learning a common latent representation. In this review, we frame factor models, autoencoders, contrastive learning approaches, and transformer-based foundation models as distinct instances of the representation learning paradigm for scRNA-seq. We provide a coherent taxonomy of these methods that articulates their conceptual foundations, shared assumptions, and key distinctions. We also discuss benchmarking and identify major challenges and open questions that will shape the future of the field.

Indexed as

RNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsAutoencoderHumansRepresentation Machine LearningSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisTranscriptomeembeddingsrepresentation learningsingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41506911
PMCPMC12990802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.