Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41506909›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Dopamine Responses in Medial Frontal Cortex Are More Consistent with a Generalized Arousal Signal Than Signed Reward Prediction Errors.

Isabella Gallello, Natalia Gorelova, Eloise Croy, Anthony G Phillips, Stan B Floresco, Jeremy K Seamans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabella GallelloDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2B5, Canada.
Natalia GorelovaDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2B5, Canada.
Eloise CroyDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2B5, Canada.
Anthony G PhillipsDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2B5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4077-5471
Stan B FlorescoDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-243X
Jeremy K SeamansDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2B5, Canada jeremyseamans@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades have seen increased interest in the function of dopamine (DA) by virtue of its role in generating Reward-Prediction Errors (RPEs) in the service of Reinforcement Learning. From the perspective of systems neuroscience, most of this research has focused on the mesostriatal and mesoaccumbens DA pathways, as technical limitations have prevented a detailed examination of the role of RPEs in the medial frontal cortex (MFC). The recent development of DA-sensitive fluorescent sensors and fiber photometry now provides relatively selective measures of DA responses, with high temporal resolution. Here the technique was used to compare MFC DA responses to appetitive, aversive, and neutral events, along with violations in learned contingencies that should theoretically generate robust RPEs in male rats. Aversive and rewarding outcomes evoked DA responses of comparable magnitude, although responses to tones paired with footshock evoked larger responses than those paired with food. Conditions used successfully to create RPEs in striatum, such as omitting outcomes, failed to provide clear evidence of signed RPE-like DA responses in the MFC. Furthermore, DA responses were similar in magnitude regardless of whether outcomes were expected or unexpected/swapped. The most parsimonious conclusion from these experiments would be that while the MFC DA is capable of conveying weak RPEs, it mainly tracks the physiological arousal created by the affective properties of appetitive or aversive stimuli.

Indexed as

ArousalDopamineFrontal LobeRewardAnimalsMaleRatsReinforcement, PsychologyDopamineprefrontalreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID41506909
PMCPMC12896690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.