ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Accuracy in Mixed Dentition Arch Length Discrepancy Prediction Methods in Surabayan Children.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate space evaluation in malocclusion using arch length discrepancy (ALD) analysis is essential for effective orthodontic interceptive treatment during the mixed dentition (MD) phase and growth and development stage (GDS). The study aimed to analyze ALD using the Sitepu, Moyers, and Tanaka- Johnston methods and also the ALD measurement technique (brass wire and segmentation technique) in Surabayan children with Angle's Class I malocclusion during the MD and GDS. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 study models of Javanese children during MD and GDS at the Dental Hospital of Airlangga University were used based on the inclusion criteria. Cervical vertebral maturation stage was used to determine the GDS. Lateral cephalometry was investigated with Steiner's analysis < A point-nasion-B point to determine the skeletal malocclusion. ALD analysis was conducted based on the Moyers, Sitepu, and Tanaka-Johnston methods. Results: There was significant difference in ALD for the maxillary arch ( Conclusion: The results of this MD and GDS study showed there were statistically significant differences in ALD among the Moyers, Sitepu, and Tanaka-Johnston methods for the maxilla, but not the mandibular arches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.