ReviewVaccine2026
Bridging the gap: a review of the factors contributing to differences in vaccination coverage among rural and urban adults.
Review in Vaccine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of seasonal influenza and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in high-risk individuals in northern Sweden.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine factors contributing to vaccination coverage differences between rural and urban adult populations; evaluate intervention studies aimed at increasing vaccine uptake among rural adult populations.
methodsWe reviewed literature published between January 2000 and April 2024. Findings are presented using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model for Behavior Change. Intervention studies were systematically evaluated using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
findingsForty-five studies were included in the final analysis and summarized qualitatively within the following topic areas: 1) factors contributing to vaccination coverage differences between rural and urban adult populations and 2) effective strategies for increasing vaccine availability among rural adult populations. Of the six intervention studies identified, only three met the criteria for direct evidence (Level I or II, fair or good quality).
conclusionsVaccination coverage differences between rural and urban adults stem primarily from opportunity and motivation-related factors. Limited intervention studies have not effectively addressed the individual or systemic barriers to vaccination for rural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.