Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2026
What Patients With Asthma Share When No One Listens: Multimethod Observational Study of Patient Narratives on Reddit.
Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of social media platforms, such as Reddit, to seek and share information about disease management and treatment strategies is increasingly common. In the context of asthma-a chronic condition characterized by limiting symptoms and exacerbations that require active patient engagement and adherence to treatment-there is a lack of research describing the content of Reddit posts and the specific topics of interest to patients.
objectiveThis study aimed to describe the topics discussed by users on the Reddit asthma forum and identify the sentiments and polarity of the language used in the posts.
methodsA retrospective observational study of public posts on the asthma subreddit forum (r/Asthma) over a 1-year period (October 2023-October 2024). All posts and related threads were included, subdivided into hot, news, and top, and those voted "up" or "down," those that received "awards," categorized as "golds." The messages were reviewed manually and excluded if they were not related to asthma. A mixed methods analysis was conducted, comprising (1) analysis using text lemmatization, (2) structural topic modeling to identify topics based on word frequency, and (3) sentiment and polarity analysis. This approach aimed to identify the most frequently used topics on Reddit, detect positive and negative sentiments based on the words used, and acceptance or rejection (polarity) based on the language used in the asthma subreddit. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.1.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing), with a significance threshold set at P<.05.
resultsAfter removing duplicates, 7806 posts were identified. The suitability of the chosen analysis model was confirmed, as it presented the best balance between exclusivity and semantic coherence. Clusters of 25 topics were identified and distributed according to their weight. The topics with the highest weight were Topic 7 (Symptoms and severity of asthma attacks) and Topic 18 (Causes of asthma). No significant differences were found in the evolution of emerging topics throughout the year except in Topic 20 (Seeking advice from people with asthma; P=.04), Topic 21 (Medical tests that should be reviewed periodically; P=.04), and Topic 22 (Times of year when attacks occur; P=.03). The proportion of feelings and emotions showed a stable trend throughout the year. Discrepancies in feelings and emotions were identified depending on the dictionaries used. Thus, a higher probability of positive feelings was confirmed in the AFINN lexicon. Meanwhile, negative feelings were significant in the Stanford Natural Language Processing, Bing, and National Research Council Canada lexicons.
conclusionsThese results can serve as a guide to identify hidden patient needs and help professionals develop specific interventions on topics relevant to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.