ArticleMSMR2026
Strategies for forecasting long COVID in the active component U.S. military.
Article in MSMR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long COVID, or post-acute coronavirus disease syndrome, represents a potentially serious threat to military readiness. Forecasts of future long COVID diagnoses could help prepare senior leaders for disruptions. Few studies predicting the incidence of long COVID have been published to date, however. Using existing COVID-19 and long COVID diagnoses, as well as demographic and outpatient encounter data, 1- to 6-month ahead and full 6-month forecasts were generated using time series and machine learning models trained on various covariate data. Forecasting models generated accurate predictions of long COVID diagnoses up to 6 months ahead of the forecasted date. Several model and covariate combinations were within 5% of the observed number of diagnoses over the full 6-month testing period, while monthly forecasts of long COVID diagnoses had median absolute percentage errors ranging from 3% to 10% for the best performing model combinations. Simple forecasting models and distribution-based forecasts that utilize existing clinical databases can provide accurate predictions of incident long COVID up to 6 months in advance and can be used to prepare for the burden of new long COVID diagnoses. Accurate predictions of long COVID cases over a 6-month period were achieved by utilizing existing COVID-19 case and outpatient encounter data from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022. Long COVID symptoms can cause disruptions to military readiness and prevent a healthy force, especially after surges in COVID-19 cases. The ability to use existing data sources to accurately predict future cases of long COVID allows senior leaders to anticipate and prepare for potential changes in the availability of service members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41505721PMC12874400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.