Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41505523›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Implementing the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Targets.

John L Gittleman, Stuart L Pimm, Berndt J Van Rensburg, Kyle S Van Houtan, Callum M Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John L GittlemanNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0009-0002-6694-1711
Stuart L PimmNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-2456
Berndt J Van RensburgSchool of The Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-5536
Kyle S Van HoutanNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Callum M RobertsDepartment of Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Targets present the most ambitious and serious conservation agenda ever developed-the overarching goal of preserving 30% of the planet by 2030. An organizational framework is now in place to deliver stable, predictive, and adaptive actions to monitor and measure the Earth's biodiversity, assess ecological and evolutionary changes, identify key drivers of those changes, and, at the core, apply effective scientific, financial, and governmental treatments to halt biodiversity decline for a sustainable future. Is this implementable? We summarize the essence of the Targets to raise key questions about their execution. We show that the reports of large conservation organizations connect to these Targets only infrequently. Yet, there is abundant evidence to measure the successes and failures of the conservation enterprise. Generally, global financial commitments are substantial and increasing. We specify improvements and continual reassessments toward protected areas, developing countries, and indigenous communities. To achieve success, we recommend actionable plans to improve implementation leading up to and following the next CBD-COP meetings.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural Resourcesconservationconservation financeKunming-Montreal Targets

Identifiers

PMID41505523
PMCPMC12799123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.