ArticlePloS one2026
SynEL: A synthetic benchmark for entity linking.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential for constructing commonsense knowledge graphs from text, demonstrating adaptability across diverse domains. However, their effectiveness varies significantly with domain-specific language, highlighting a critical need for specialized benchmarks to assess and optimize knowledge graph construction sub-tasks like named entity recognition, relation extraction, and entity linking. Currently, domain-specific benchmarks are scarce. To address this gap, we introduce SynEL, a novel benchmark developed for evaluating text-based knowledge extraction methods, validated using customer support dialogues. We present a comprehensive methodology for benchmark construction, propose two distinct approaches for generating synthetic datasets, and evaluate accumulated hallucinations. Our experiments reveal that existing LLMs experience a significant performance drop, with micro-F1 scores decreasing by up to 25 absolute points when extracting low-resource entities compared to high-resource entities from sources like Wikipedia. Furthermore, by incorporating synthetic datasets into the training process, we achieved an improvement in micro-F1 scores of up to 10 absolute points. We publicly release our benchmark and generation code to demonstrate its utility for fine-tuning and evaluating LLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.