ArticlePloS one2026
The investigation and prevalence of pulmonary embolism among emergency department patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD): A multi-centered linked administrative database study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) may be investigated for pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED), little is known about the prevalence of PE and factors associated with investigation. We sought to evaluate the PE prevalence among patients presenting to the ED with AECOPD.
methodsAll adult patients presenting with AECOPD to six EDs between January 2015 and June 2021 using ICD-10-CA codes from administrative data. The primary outcomes were the investigation for and prevalence of PE. Conventional, age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD) and chest imaging are reported. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of investigations for PE among patients with AECOPD, including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and ED presentation data as covariates.
resultsOf the 25,510 patients with AECOPD, 12,164 (48%) patients (median age 70 years, 50% males, 46% hospitalized) were included after applying exclusion criteria. Overall, 2,072 (17%) patients received at least one test for PE: 84% had a D-dimer, 44% had a chest CT and 2% had lung scans. Overall, 68 (0.5%) patients received a diagnosis of PE; 41 (0.3%) received a PE co-diagnosis in the ED and 27 (0.2%) patients received a primary PE diagnosis while hospitalized. Use of an AADD could reduce CT image ordering by approximately 13%. Overall, 852 (7%) returned to the ED and 490 (4%) died within 30 days. The presence of chest pain (aOR=2.71; 95% CI: 2.24-3.28) and cough/congestion (aOR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.46-0.70) increased and decreased PE investigations, respectively.
conclusionThe overall prevalence of PE among patients presenting to the ED with AECOPD was low (less than 1%). While acknowledging PE may occur concurrently with AECOPD, clinicians should be cautious to avoid over-investigation, which has a negative impact on operational flow, increases costs, and may be harmful to patients. Evidence-based pathways using information readily available at presentation and selective investigations (e.g., decision rules and AADD cut-offs) have the potential to improve resource use and facilitate shared decision-making in the acute setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.