ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The barriers and enablers of outbreak reporting in the Asia-Pacific region: A mixed methods study of field epidemiologists.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outbreak reporting is thought to be subject to technical, or capacity, barriers that physically hinder reporting and non-technical barriers, such as the threat of economic losses, that discourage governments from reporting. While technical barriers to reporting have been extensively explored, there is less evidence for the effects of non-technical barriers, particularly at the subnational level. To better understand the impact of both technical and non-technical barriers at the subnational level, we conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study involving field epidemiology training program (FETP) trainees and graduates in the Asia-Pacific region. We first surveyed study participants on the importance of putative outbreak reporting barriers and enablers using a three-point Likert scale and free text responses. We then interviewed respondents to more deeply explore key factors affecting outbreak reporting that were elicited from the survey. We calculated counts and percentages for all survey variables, and we coded free text responses from the survey and the interview transcripts. We then used thematic analysis to derive common themes from our findings. Fifty-six FETP trainees or graduates completed the survey, representing 19 Asia-Pacific countries and territories; of these respondents, we interviewed 16. The barrier noted by most survey respondents to have a high reporting impact was lack of staff (28, 50.0%). The enablers noted by most survey respondents to have a high reporting impact were training about what and how to report an outbreak (40, 71.4%) and sufficient surveillance resources (40, 71.4%). Based on our survey and interview findings, we elicited four thematic barriers - lack of capacity, behavioural barriers, political and socioeconomic barriers, and bureaucratic barriers - and three thematic enablers - building capacity, building a culture of reporting, and political and bureaucratic support. Although lack of capacity was found to disrupt reporting at the subnational level, several non-technical barriers also impacted reporting, particularly economic and reputational concerns. Future studies should explore these barriers beyond the Asia-Pacific region.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.