ArticlePloS one2026
"I think the humanity just gets lost over and over again": A phenomenological study of the experiences of higher-weight medical students.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eating disorders risk and body shape concerns among medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of research has found weight stigma to independently drive both morbidity and mortality, regardless of actual weight. This has, however, yet to translate into medical education and practice. Studies have shown doctors to be common sources of weight stigma, which may be driven, in part, by their medical training. Higher-weight doctors may be best placed to understand and support the health needs of higher-weight people. However, significant levels of implicit anti-fat bias towards higher-weight colleagues lingers in the medical profession. Inclusive practices and more holistic education around weight are therefore needed to support and retain higher weight doctors within the workforce, starting within medical schools. This may improve both staff experiences and patient care. This study aims to explore the experiences of higher weight medical students in the UK. This is an interpretive phenomenological study. Three higher-weight medical students (two women, 1 man, all 2nd year medical students, BMI range 31-50 kg/m2) underwent loosely structured interviews over Microsoft Teams. These were audio-recorded. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and underwent an interpretive phenomenological analysis. Participants reported logistic and environmental issues, such a lack of provision of larger uniform sizes or narrow small lecture room seat sizes. They also reported negative experiences with peers, teachers, and the general public in relation to their size. Despite this, higher-weight doctors were indeed felt to be important to advocate for higher-weight patients. Negative experiences seemed to stem from wider sociocultural issues and reflect the intersectional nature of weight stigma. To improve matters in the longer term, medical schools should review and update their weight-related teaching, alongside considering the accessibility of their physical environments. Medical schools could consider weight stigma as part of their current efforts to decolonise medical curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.