ArticlePloS one2026
Stigma and labelling of immigrant personal support workers during COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario: Implications for policy.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the livelihoods of people from diverse socio-economic backgrounds in Canada. In this study, we focus on immigrant essential workers, who played pivotal roles in sustaining Canada's socio-economic and healthcare sectors during this crisis. Drawing data from twenty-five in-depth interviews with immigrant personal support workers, we found that immigrant personal support workers experience a complex and compounding type of stigma, traceable to their location at race, gender, class, and ethno-national lines. Using intersectionality and stigma as guiding theoretical frameworks, our study looks at the impact of stigma and labelling on personal support workers in the Windsor, Ontario, Canada, the intersectional character of such stigma, and the novel challenges introduced by the pandemic. The findings show that although some people praised personal support workers for their work on the frontlines, since others viewed them as carriers of the COVID-19 virus, certain changes had to be made to their daily routines to avoid being seen as a personal support worker. Additionally, challenges in the workplace included lack of personal protective equipment and unsafe work environments. Immigrant personal support workers were affectionately labelled 'essential' workers, as they were performing critical tasks at the forefront of the pandemic response. Personal support workers also found themselves in a duality of public opinion by being recognized as 'essential' workers, yet being simultaneously stigmatized as potential sources for the spread of COVID-19. The findings provide insights into changes that need to be made in the future toward improving immigrant personal support workers' health and well-being in times of crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.