Observational studyPloS one2026
Social determinants in the delay of starting colorectal cancer treatment.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed access to colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment leads to disease progression, advanced stages at diagnosis, and reduced survival. In Brazil, Law 12.732/2012 mandates treatment initiation within 60 days of diagnosis; however, disparities persist. To assess compliance with the 60-day treatment initiation window for CRC in Brazil and its association with individual, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors. We conducted a longitudinal observational retrospective cohort study using data from 65,582 CRC cases diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 in Brazil. Individual-level data were obtained from the Integrator of Hospital Cancer Registries, while socioeconomic and healthcare infrastructure data were extracted from national databases. A Multilevel Poisson Regression model with a random intercept was applied. Approximately forty-two percent of patients experienced treatment delays beyond 60 days, with significant variability among Federal Units (UFs). The highest delay rates were observed in Goiás (60.7%), Pará (60.6%), and Acre (58.4%). Factors associated with delayed treatment included younger age, non-white race, low educational level, rectal tumor location, referral through the Unified Health System (SUS), and receiving treatment outside the patient's municipality of residence. Social determinants significantly impact CRC treatment delays in Brazil, highlighting the need to strengthen healthcare policies to ensure equitable and timely access to cancer treatment, ultimately improving patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.