ArticlePloS one2026
Differences in soil carbon fractions and microbial communities and their underlying mechanisms between assisted natural regeneration and plantation forests in subtropical China.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subtropical forests are critical to regional carbon cycling, yet the mechanisms by which forest management practices influence soil organic carbon (SOC) stability are not yet fully understood. This study assessed SOC fractions and microbial communities across four forest management types in southeastern China: secondary forest, assisted natural regeneration (ANR), and two monoculture plantations (Castanopsis carlesii and Cunninghamia lanceolata). We measured soil physicochemical properties, microbial biomass, and community composition, and used structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify the biotic and abiotic pathways regulating SOC dynamics. The results showed that ANR maintained SOC concentrations and microbial traits comparable to those of secondary forests, while significantly reducing labile carbon losses relative to monoculture plantations. At our site, ANR also exhibited higher fine-root input and richer understory cover than plantations, supporting microbially mediated LC retention and, ultimately, greater SOC stabilization. SEM identified two partially independent regulatory pathways: (1) aboveground litter inputs influenced soil pH, carbon:nitrogen ratio, and ammonium nitrogen. These changes promoted the conversion of labile carbon into recalcitrant carbon and increased total SOC. (2) fine root biomass enhanced labile carbon accumulation by increasing the abundance of Gram-positive bacteria. Recalcitrant carbon is conventionally considered a stable SOC component. However, the SEM identified no direct pathway of influence from recalcitrant carbon to total SOC. This finding underscores the central role of labile carbon in SOC stabilization in humid subtropical systems. These findings demonstrate that ANR mitigates carbon losses by enhancing microbially mediated carbon retention and reducing disturbance. This approach supports SOC preservation through improved litter dynamics and root-microbe interactions, providing insights for sustainable forest carbon management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.