Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41505350›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Intervention in Health Misinformation Using Large Language Models for Automated Detection, Thematic Analysis, and Inoculation: Case Study on COVID-19.

Samira Malek, Christopher Griffin, Robert D Fraleigh, Robert Lennon, Vishal Monga, Lijiang Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samira MalekDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2530-3846
Christopher GriffinApplied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9962-9540
Robert D FraleighApplied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-7544
Robert LennonPrimeCare Medical, Harrisburg, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-5890
Vishal MongaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-2263
Lijiang ShenDepartment of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Sparks Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States, 1 (814) 865-1736.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4870-4878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid growth of social media as an information channel has enabled the swift spread of inaccurate or false health information, significantly impacting public health. This widespread dissemination of misinformation has caused confusion, eroded trust in health authorities, led to noncompliance with health guidelines, and encouraged risky health behaviors. Understanding the dynamics of misinformation on social media is essential for devising effective public health communication strategies. Objective: This study aims to present a comprehensive and automated approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) and machine learning techniques to detect misinformation on social media, uncover the underlying causes and themes, and generate refutation arguments, facilitating control of its spread and promoting public health outcomes by inoculating people against health misinformation. Methods: We use 2 datasets to train 3 LLMs, namely, BERT, T5, and GPT-2, to classify documents into 2 categories: misinformation and nonmisinformation. In addition, we use a separate dataset to identify misinformation topics. To analyze these topics, we applied 3 topic modeling algorithms-Latent Dirichlet Allocation, Top2Vec, and BERTopic-and selected the optimal model based on performance evaluated across 3 metrics. Using a prompting approach, we extract sentence-level representations for the topics to uncover their underlying themes. Finally, we design a prompt text capable of identifying misinformation themes effectively. Results: The trained BERT model demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving 98% accuracy in classifying misinformation and nonmisinformation, with a 44% reduction in false-positive rates for artificial intelligence-generated misinformation. Among the 3 topic modeling approaches used, BERTopic outperformed the others, achieving the highest metrics with a Coherence Value of 0.41, Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information of -0.086, and Inverse Rank-Biased Overlap of 0.99. To address the issue of unclassified documents, we developed an algorithm to assign each document to its closest topic. In addition, we proposed a novel method using prompt engineering to generate sentence-level representations for each topic, achieving a 99.6% approval rate as "appropriate" or "somewhat appropriate" by 3 independent raters. We further designed a prompt text to identify themes of misinformation topics and developed another prompt capable of detecting misinformation themes with 82% accuracy. Conclusions: This study presents a comprehensive and automated approach to addressing health misinformation on social media using advanced machine learning and natural language processing techniques. By leveraging LLMs and prompt engineering, the system effectively detects misinformation, identifies underlying themes, and provides explanatory responses to combat its spread. The proposed method was tested on an English language COVID-19-related dataset and has not been evaluated on real-world online social media data; the experiments were conducted offline.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19Social MediaHumansLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19large language modelsmachine learningmisinformationprompt engineeringtopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID41505350
PMCPMC12791202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.